The Highs and Lows of Event Logos
I’ve always been a logo guy. I guess that comes from my college days, when I got my degree in marketing. My wife pays attention to logos too. Susan was an art major and got her degree in graphic design, when computers were very new and a lot of that was still done on drawing boards. As you can imagine, there is a lot of interest in our household when it comes to each logo for the Indianapolis 500.
When I was a budding Indianapolis 500 fan growing up in the 60s, logos were not that big of a deal. The Indianapolis Motor Speedway hosted one event each year, and we all knew what that was – the Indianapolis 500. There were a couple of variations on the traditional Wing & Wheel logo to the present logo, but that’s all there was for years.
Then, in 1981 – IMS designed a specific logo for the 65th Running, which reflects the style of the times.
Since then, there has been a different logo for each Indianapolis 500, with varying degrees of taste – good and bad. When the Brickyard 400 came about in 1994, it warranted its own event logo. Then Formula One, Moto GP and the GMR Grand Prix each got their own logos each and every year. For our purposes, this post will only focus on some of the Indianapolis 500 logos that have come about over the years – some of my favorites and not-so-favorites.
Some of my favorites include:
1986
1991
1992
1994
1995
1999
2002
2007
2008
2011
2013
2014
2019
I really liked the 2019 logo, except for two things – only one of which is visible. Practically most logos prior to the 2019 logo said Indianapolis 500. The 2019 logo began the regular use of Indy 500. History indicates that Tony Hulman did not care for the term Indy 500 at all. Supposedly in the first half of the past century, the only people that called the city Indy were out-of-towners. No Hoosiers referred to the city as Indy.
Consequently, Hulman disliked the name Indy 500. Those feelings were passed along to Donald Davidson and ultimately to people like me. That is why in fourteen years of my writings, I always refer to the race strictly as The Indianapolis 500. Naturally I would bristle at a logo that says Indy 500. I’m sure that younger folks or non-traditionalists will disagree with me, but that’s my one of my two complaints about the 2019 logo.
The other is that it is a template. It is essentially the same basic logo used for the past five years. Yes, it goes from bricks, to a checkered flag, to the Pagoda, to the wheat of the Harvest Classic, but the basic design is the same. This year, it looks like the forgot they had to come up with a logo, so they just took the underlying template and used that at the last minute.
I have to say that the 2023 Indianapolis 500 logo may be one of my least favorites, simply due to the lack of imagination that went into it.
Speaking of logos I don’t like. Here are a few, with special attention for my all-time least favorite – the 2012 logo, with the 2017 logo a close second.
1983
1989
1990
2001
2003
2004
2006
2012
2017
I am sure there are some of you who despise the ones I really like, and some that love the ones I find objectionable. That’s why we are free to have opinions.
In the 90s and early 2000s, it used to be that we learned the next year’s logo when we see the ticket renewal form for the next year in the program. Once we got into the digital age, the new logo magically appeared on the race website the day after the race. Recently, there has been an announcement at some point in the Month of May unveiling the next year’s logo.
My hope for the future is that they realize they have gotten about all they can from the template of the last five years. I would also like for them to get away from templates altogether. The Super Bowl used to have very unique logos that played off of whatever city the game was in. Recently, they went to just putting emphasis on the Roman numerals, making that the only difference from year to year. It didn’t take real long for the Super Bowl logos to get real boring and start running together. The last few Indianapolis 500 logos have gotten very boring. If they are utilizing the templates to save money, Susan has told me she would gladly offer up her graphic design talents to design a new logo each year, for free.
I hope they will get back to a very unique logo for each year, where some thought and imagination goes into it – and not anything as boring as this year’s logo.
George Phillips
May 8, 2023 at 7:55 am
First time in a while I looked at the Centennial Era logo. I really loved that. Just great. As far as the individual race logos, I liked 1986 and 2002.
May 8, 2023 at 8:21 am
I have no major disagreements with your logo likes and dislikes, except I did like the 1989 logo.
May 8, 2023 at 9:50 am
The 2013 logo should have been great… but the gold upright rising out of the middle of the 0 in the middle of 500 makes the 500 look like “SUO”.
2004 is brutal. I’ll give some of the other bad ones credit for trying something different, but not 2004.
Among those not shown, I like the 1984 and 1987 logos, the 500 in negative space is a nice touch. While very much of its time, I liked the 2000 logo. I also thought the 2016 logo was pretty good, despite the use of “Indy”.
The 1995 logo has a similar problem as the 2013 logo, the diamond shape of the 500 makes it look like “SOD”. Some stray lines behind the circular Indianapolis text also makes the city name look like “Inbianapolis”. Unlike 2013, 1995 is one of the worst.
1993 is pretty middling overall, but should be mentioned for how influential it has been. While it has been modified several times, the car silhouette in the 1993 500 logo is essentially STILL in use today in the Indycar logo.
May 8, 2023 at 10:02 am
Couldn’t agree more… have always disliked the “Indy” logos. It’s just like when folks say their from “Cali” … it’s just not right! I know it’s fewer letters and syllables to say but do we have to be lazy about everything?
My favorites have always been those that were variations from the original with the Centennial Era with the spoked wheel logo probably being my favorite style.
May 8, 2023 at 11:18 am
It was a tradition of mine through several years that I always ordered the tie-dye tee shirt with each year’s logo. 2012 was not one of my faves and the 2013 model faded badly when washed (particularly the screen print logo. Other than those two, I have generally enjoyed most that I bought between 2011 and 2019, particularly the centennial (2011)
model.
May 8, 2023 at 11:30 am
The first logo with seven flags gets my vote.
“ that’s why we are free to have opinions”
Long may that last …..
May 8, 2023 at 1:39 pm
Interesting topic . The annual logo as the ticket design is something to look forward to every year. Only memorabilia I consistently collect is the annual edition of the embroidered logo patch and matching hat pin as well as my ticket stub. Rarely any hats , shirts , etc., unless in the bargain bin. Accordingly the logo is of interest to me. I agree with most of your hits and misses and particularly with your opinions on using the full Indianapolis 500 in the logo and certainly the most recent template versions . I don’t have much artistic ability or graphic artistry imagination however I assume Penske Entertainment certainly has access to great designers, that said I would hope to see more interesting logos in the future years . Not that they need any advice from me however perhaps they could take submissions from fans in a contest form and award a prize of a couple of suite tickets or such. Of course no political or social justice topics being incorporated.