Leave the Playoffs to Stick & Ball Sports

geothumbnail10
The summer sports are coming to an end. All that is left is the end to the Formula One season. NASCAR crowned their 2023 champion last night. Team Penske’s Ryan Blaney won his first Cup Championship at Phoenix Raceway, by finishing second. All he had to do was finish ahead of the other three still alive for the championship – Christopher Bell, Kyle Larson and William Byron. Bell went out early when he blew a brake rotor and crashed on Lap 108. Ross Chastain won the race, but Blaney won the championship by finishing ahead of Larson (third) and Byron (fourth). It was a nice exclamation point to a long season.

The World Series concluded last week. I’m still not a fan of November baseball, but at least it only crept one day into the month of Thanksgiving. The Texas Rangers won their first World Series in franchise history. I’m happy about that because they are a good franchise that has been close, but never could close the deal. Not everyone is happy, however. Many fans feel like the new playoff format dilutes the regular season so much, that they feel it rewards mediocrity and it encourages teams to come out of nowhere and be crowned champion.

I’m old enough that I remember when the second version of the Washington Senators relocated to Dallas in 1971 and became the Texas Rangers. I’m also old enough to remember when there were no divisions whatsoever in baseball, just two leagues – the American and National Leagues. There were no divisional playoffs. The team with the best regular season record in each league automatically went straight to the World Series. There were no other teams involved, nor were there any other playoffs. When the two leagues split into and Eastern and Western Division in 1969, everyone screamed how the new playoff format was diluting the World Series.

Personally, I no longer care what playoff format Major League Baseball uses. At one time, I followed baseball almost as closely as I follow football. Both sets of grandparents were staunch St. Louis Cardinals fans. Every summer night, they would sit and listen to each pitch over the radio to the dulcet tones of Harry Carey. I remember being in fifth grade, packing my father’s Zenith transistor radio in by book bag for school. I rigged up the wiring for the ear-piece to run up the back of the chair and hide it away in my ear. In the afternoon hours of school, I listened to the Cardinals lose to the Detroit Tigers in seven games in the World Series. Although my team lost, that memory of listening to day baseball in school was golden.

More than a quarter-century later, a baseball strike wiped out the 1994 World Series. The strike lasted into the beginning of the 1995 season. I never purposely boycotted, I just had lost interest in the sport. My interest waned over the next few years, until it reached a point where I hardly watched baseball at all. This season, I watched bits of about five regular-season games and not one pitch of the playoffs or World Series. It’s a shame, considering how much I followed baseball – especially in the 70s and 80s. Anyway, I digress…

When NASCAR first went to their Chase format in 2004, racing purists screamed about how this was no way to crown a champion. Unlike when the baseball purists were screaming about diluting the World Series, I agreed with the purists regarding the NASCAR Chase for the Championship. Ten years later, they expanded the Chase to sixteen drivers and re-branded their Chase format as the NASCAR Playoffs.

To me, this sounded absurd. No other sport had all the other season-long participants playing along during the playoffs. A driver that is thirtieth in points can still steal a win during the NASCAR Playoffs. Chastain won last night’s race, even though he had already been eliminated.

NASCAR is loaded with gimmicks, with the Playoffs just being one of many. IndyCar flirted heavily with NASCAR’s dreaded Green-White-Checker (GWC) rule at last May’s Indianapolis 500. Many fans are in favor of IndyCar adopting the GWC rule. I’m not. Not as many, but some fans think that the NTT IndyCar Series should institute something that mimics NASCAR Playoff format. I disagree with that also.

Think about it. When you use the NASCAR proportions of drivers and races; IndyCar would have roughly ten drivers qualify for a Playoff format over the final five races of the season. This past season, that would be Nashville, IMS Road Course, Gateway, Portland and Laguna Seca. That would be a street course that provides random finishes, three natural terrain road courses and an oval. As each race is completed two drivers would be eliminated, until we get down to the final two at Laguna Seca, which provided a lot of randomness this season.

The argument for a racing playoff system is that it adds excitement at the end of the season. I will be the first to admit that the last five races of this past IndyCar season held little drama, as Alex Palou ran away with the championship and clinched it before the transporters even arrived at Laguna Seca. Alex Palou finished seventh at Gateway, with two races to go.

Under the NASCAR format, that may have been enough to eliminate Palou. Regardless of what you think of Palou or Chip Ganassi, is it really fair to eliminate your best team and driver that dominated the season, simply due to a gimmicky new format? Some will say he knew the rules, but I would think that would be a huge injustice to Palou or any other driver in the position.

Call me old-fashioned, but I like keeping the championship simple. If you score more points than anyone else throughout the season, you win the championship. There is no changing the rules in the last five races, just to keep fans engaged. If fans can’t stay engaged over a seventeen-race season, maybe they had better find a sport that requires a far-shorter attention span.

The NFL keeps tweaking its playoff format. I remember when each conference was divided into three divisions. They took each divisional winner and then the team that had the best overall record without winning their division, as a wildcard. That created a four-team playoff in each conference to determine who went to the Super Bowl. These days fourteen teams vie for the right to go to the Super Bowl. That’s why teams with losing records make it into the playoffs, which should never happen in any sport. I feel like if a team has a losing record, they should forfeit their playoff spot to a team with a better record – even if they win their division. Losing-record teams in any playoff system is the ultimate definition of a diluted playoff.

I don’t think the powers-that-be with IndyCar are considering a playoff-type format at this time. It does not seem to have increased any new interest in NASCAR, but it has alienated and driven away some of their core fan-base. Let’s hope IndyCar never jumps into that diluted pool.

George Phillips

11 Responses to “Leave the Playoffs to Stick & Ball Sports”

  1. George…I couldn’t agree with you more. No playoffs for INDYCAR ever. I wasn’t a fan of the way they ended last years Indy 590 either. I was, like you, a baseball fan and you actually watched more baseball this year than I did. Don’t change what isn’t broken.

  2. Well said!

  3. billytheskink's avatar
    billytheskink Says:

    The TV folks seem to like NASCAR’s playoffs format, but it is certainly silly. I will say that it has been tweaked to the point where a dominant “regular season” will generally line a driver up with enough points to survive a rough race or two and drivers near the back of the playoff “grid” pretty much always need to win in order to move on. It does a better job than it once did making sure that the final 4 are all or mostly top season-long performers… only to give us that unsatisfying top finisher-take-all finale.

    And just for kicks and grins, here are the results of the “playoffs” system George hypothesized (10 drivers qualifying over the final 5 races, eliminating two each round) using NASCAR’s win-and-in and playoff point structure and the standard Indycar points payout per race.

    Playoff grid heading into Nashville (with points)
    1. Palou 2035 points
    2. Newgarden 2030
    3. Ericsson 2012
    4. McLaughlin 2011
    5. Dixon 2008
    6. Lundgaard 2007
    7. Kirkwood 2006
    8. O’Ward 2005
    9. Power 2004
    10. Herta 2003

    Eliminated in Nashville: Power and Herta
    Eliminated in Indy GP: Lundgaard and Ericsson
    Eliminated in Gateway: Kirkwood and Newgarden
    Eliminated in Portland: O’Ward and McLaughlin
    Championship 2 at Laguna Seca: Dixon and Palou
    Champion: Scott Dixon

    Final standings (points and +/- positions from real standings)
    1. Dixon 2229 (+1)
    2. Palou 2214 (-1)
    3. McLaughlin 2170 (0)
    4. O’Ward 2160 (0)
    5. Lundgaard 2122 (+3)
    6. Kirkwood 2121 (+5)
    7. Ericsson 2120 (-1)
    8. Power 2113 (-1)
    9. Newgarden 2112 (-4)
    10. Herta 2083 (0)

  4. I agree! It’s much easier on everyone by following the KISS rule and not fixing what isn’t broken. Change, just for the sake of change… is BAD!

    • Thanks for shining a spotlight on this trend. As many have said, change for the sake of change is bad for competition. In this case, we can hope that the Penske steady hand will save us from this nonsense, but last years Indy 500 finish says otherwise. A steady hand doesn’t seem to be enough in today’s culture. The forces of insatiable shareholder demand, social media, and audience ADD seem to drive us towards gimmick land, not away.

  5. I’m like an old record but for me it’s the driver with the most wins who should be Champion. If a tie then decided on the most seconds etc. No points need to awarded under such a system. No pole position points or fastest laps or double for a certain race etc.

    Race to win.

  6. TV disagrees.
    quote, regarding the World Series:

    “Still, the World Series viewership totals were generally stronger than anything else on network television these days.”

  7. NASCAR is experiencing baseball’s ratings dip. While ratings have been in decline since 2006, they have reached surprising lows this fall. Talladega, always among the most popular races on the calendar with casual viewers, had a TV audience of 2.5 million. On NBC. With no rain delay or other red flags. I was shocked by that number. You’ve got to go back 30 years or more to find a network TV audience for Talladega that small for a straightforward race.

    People who hold NASCAR dear will deny it, but I suspect it is apathy for the gimmicky playoffs. For the last part, only the last race matters, so why bother to watch before Phoenix? Other recent races have had little more than 2 million viewers. Some blame football season, but the NFL has been the sports ratings King for decades. Why were NASCAR’s ratings soaring in the 90s & early 2000s, even during football season? Because their racing was compelling, and it was being marketed effectively. These and other factors made them the #2 or #3 sports property in America, and all it took were some hair-brained ideas to slash those big ratings by over 50%. Before too long, the Indy 500 will again be the most watched auto race in America.

  8. Don Newcomb's avatar
    Don Newcomb Says:

    i agree no playoffs. if they want to spice at it have double points at all oval races

  9. […] 2023 at 4:02 am and is filed under IndyCar. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own […]

  10. There is a reason us old people live by the mantra “Change is Bad”. It’s because it is true, at least 90% of the time. Especially when it comes to sports. Anyone who has been fortunate enough to watch football, baseball, the Olympics, auto racing, etc. for multiple decades will tell you that the way the games are played today pale in comparison to the 60’s through the early 90’s. We know because we saw it, experienced it, and lived it. The only way any of these sports are better today is through safety innovations. This is especially so in auto racing, not so much in football – see the NFL’s roughing the passer rule. MLB welcomed 12 out of 30 teams, a full 40%, to make the “playoffs” and a have a chance at a World Series Championship. I don’t even know how many drivers make NASCAR’s “playoffs”, mainly because I don’t care anymore and it changes every couple of years. INDYCAR has a very fair way of determining their season long champion and I hope they NEVER adopt any sort of silly playoff system.

Leave a reply to S0CSeven Cancel reply