No “Chase” Needed Here

Ever since Randy Bernard became CEO of the IZOD IndyCar Series just a little over four months ago, he has made many changes throughout the league that I mostly applaud – not that he needs my applause in order to be successful. But it is the one thing that he hasn’t done, that I am most thankful for; he hasn’t instituted a NASCAR-like “chase” format.

NASCAR CEO Brian France was eager to put his stamp on the sport he inherited from his father Bill France, Jr. and his grandfather; NASCAR founder Bill France. His father and grandfather were icons in the sport. Brian had come up through the family business and had directed NASCAR’s marketing department before being named CEO in 2003, when his father stepped aside. One of his first acts was to institute the “Chase for the Championship” in 2004.

Realizing that interest in stock car racing dropped dramatically after Labor Day, once football season started – he devised a plan for the final ten races of the season to make only the top ten drivers in points eligible for the championship, no matter how close number eleven was. Points were compressed and re-set, basically giving the driver in first place only a slight advantage and the driver in tenth usually found himself a lot closer to the top than he had been,

The idea was to create a “playoff” atmosphere at the end of their season. The comparison to the NFL was that even though a team may go 14-2 through the regular season, it could very well be upset at any time during the playoffs. The main difference was that there were still to be thirty cars on the track each week that were not eligible to participate in the “chase”.

The idea was met with mixed reaction, at best. The word “contrived” generally popped up whenever “the chase” was discussed. For years, NASCAR had crowned its champion just like any other racing body; the driver that accumulated the most points throughout the season was the champion. Now they were throwing this curve into the mix and their hard-core fan base didn’t like it. In their minds, it cheapened the first twenty-six races of the season and put added importance to venues such as Fontana, Kansas, Texas and Homestead – newer tracks that don’t immediately conjure up images of thrilling stock car racing.

In 2007, the format was tweaked to allow twelve drivers into “the chase”, which blew out their argument for cutting it off at ten originally. They were quick to point out that no driver more than ten places back with ten races to go had ever won the championship. So why expand it to twelve? They said the fans wanted it. How tainted would a crown be in the eyes of NASCAR die-hards if someone in this newly contrived format squeaked into the twelfth position and then went on to win the championship. They supposedly offset this by giving additional points for every race win.

Now it is pretty evident that “the chase” will be tweaked again. They may expand it to fifteen drivers or it may include more races or further point shuffling. In the meantime, the fickle fans who were intrigued by NASCAR in 2001 are now leaving the sport as quickly as they found it. The quaintness of following the good ol’ boys has grown tiresome and they have moved on. They also have become bored with Jimmie Johnson winning four “chase” championships in a row and possibly on his way to a fifth consecutive trophy for 2010.

What NASCAR is left with is a disgruntled fan base that feels like the sport that they once knew has left them. NASCAR went Hollywood and forgot those that got them there – their fans. And those fans that are left are stuck with an ever-changing way of determining what they perceive as a false champion. Each year that NASCAR crowns a new champion under this new format, a comparison of points under the old system is always brought up. Under the previous format, Jimmie Johnson would have won only two championships – in 2006 and 2009.

But drivers like Johnson shouldn’t be criticized. They are simply working the system that they have been handed. It’s the system that needs changing.

That (finally) brings me back to the IZOD IndyCar Series. Some fans have lampooned Randy Bernard for creating the oval (AJ Foyt) and road course (Mario Andretti) trophies. I have no problem with them because they were created within the existing system. It is something to recognize an accomplishment within a certain discipline without taking attention away from the real prize – the season championship.

The biggest race on the IndyCar schedule is the Indianapolis 500. Consequently, I have no problem with additional points being allocated to that race. Teams budget a large amount of time and money for the Month of May. It isn’t just another race and the points structure should reflect that. This year, they revised the qualifying format and added additional points for qualifying at Indy. I think they should consider adding more points for the race itself.

Halfway through this season, Will Power looks dominant. He has three wins and is pulling away from his closest threats. He may indeed wrap up the championship with one or possibly two races to go. It may get more than slightly monotonous if he keeps up this pace – but so be it. He should not be penalized and have points artificially taken away from him, all in the name of entertainment. It is up to the other teams and drivers to step up their game, rather than relying on some ridiculous format concocted by a marketing whiz – just to spice things up.

The IZOD IndyCar Series is just now showing signs of coming out of the doldrums. There is a lot of work to be done and probably many changes will be forthcoming – some more popular than others. But as for coming up with some convoluted format for the last third of the season – I think Randy Bernard’s inactions on that point speak clearly. We need to leave the “Chase for the Championship” only for those same people that brought you the green-white-checker.

George Phillips

11 Responses to “No “Chase” Needed Here”

  1. I’ve hated the Chase since 04, and I hope Indycar NEVER thinks about it. Of course, Indycar’s championship isn’t long enough to really do a chase, you’d have like a 12 race season followed by a 5 race playoff, that would be kinda dumb.

  2. M. Miller Says:

    I agree with you OP. The chase is nothing more than a giant competition yellow for the season.

    But if you’re a manufacturer, chassis or engine, how can you truely push your product on the results of racing when those results are so manipulated? It can no longer be a proving ground.

    So it does not just turn fans off, but a chase makes true competition meaningless.

  3. A “chase” wouldn’t work, for reasons Dylan stated above. And it certainly isn’t necessary.

    (Something else I hope they never borrow from Nascar is allow all the exceptions in qualifying. I realize, with the present car count, it doesn’t apply right now–but I love the drama of making the race or not.)

  4. George — Last year it all NATURALLY came down to Homestead … and even then, that race was remarkably unexciting. Why? Because there was little difference in our minds b/w Dario & Dixon & Briscoe — that’s like choosing b/w Walgreens & CVS & Rite Aid when all you need is some Immodium.

    Point being, unless fans start having a genuine rooting interest in a particular driver, a Chase-type format seems pointless. Does that make any sense?

    (Trying to make coherent racing points gives me an unsightly rash on my forehead. This probably isn’t for me.)

    • Yes! Can America become interested in, then avidly follow the IndyCar Series’s athletes who don’t strip clothes for magazine photo shoots?
      I have been waiting and waiting for increased sponsorship of the series, of teams, and of drivers. I have been waiting for team sponsors to ‘activate’ their sponsorship and promote the athletes who take podiums, wins and championships while wearing their brandmarks.
      Glad to see Izod sponsor Ryan Hunter-Reay for years, using RH-R in ads (remember the jumbo Times Square ad the month that Ryan won at The Glen?), and now sponsor the whole series and use some drivers in national (and cooperative [Macy’s]) advertising campaigns.
      Glad to see Dollar General’s sponsorship of Sarah Fisher and its ‘use’ of her, which in turn gives her more exposure.
      Let’s see MORE athlete- and team sponsors trumpet their involvement in the sport by ‘using’ the racers in more regional and national marketing campaigns and thus increase the general public’s awareness of the drivers then affinity for a particular racer.

  5. billytheskink Says:

    I would support a “chase” in IndyCar, provided it was 16-22 races long. I also support extending NASCAR’s chase, preferably to 36 events…

    The worst championship system is the NHRA’s “countdown”. Nothing wipes out a hard-earned points lead like the Countdown to 1.

  6. My whole objection is exactly what George points out here: The contrived-ness of such a step. It’s an artificial imposition. NASCAR’s sin is that they’re manipulating things too much, from phantom “debris on the track” to that damn Chase. It turns what can be genuine competition into something artificially manipulated. It’s too many fingers stirring a stew that should just be left to cook, so to speak.

    Maybe the reason they lost viewership in the fall is because they have too damn many races already. Eliminate many of the duplicate dates and they’ll probably see no falloff without needing to massage results artificially. Regardless, I hope to God that Izod Indycar doesn’t follow in their footsteps. NASCAR can afford missteps because they’d cruise right through mistakes and keep viewership on just momentum alone (witness the maintainance of high viewership after the implementation of the COT), but Indycar wouldn’t have that same cushion. Bernard cannot make the same mistake; it would have the potential to really injure the series if he did.

  7. What NASCAR doesn’t seem to realize, and what they continue to show that they don’t realize amid the current rumors of making extra drivers eligible for the Chase and then eliminating drivers and resetting points and other accounting gymnastics until a few are still in Chase contention at the last race, is that you don’t need 12 or even 6 drivers to make for a compelling championship picture at the last race. Two will do just fine. Three is an embarrassment of riches. The other thing that NASCAR doesn’t get is that rewarding drivers for winning races works just fine as a motivator to get people to try to pass each other. Right now, NASCAR rewards the winner with a 8.8% points premium over a 2nd place, and a dead last start-and-park 43rd gets 18.4% as many points as a winner. There’s why guys cruise around for points. When you can win almost as many points for a 4th as a win, there’s no real incentive to tear up your equipment just to go after 10-20 extra points.

    Meanwhile, in IndyCar, winners are given 25% more points than guys who finish second, so it’s possible to chase another driver down with a run of wins or good finishes at the end of the year without having to depend on your title rival also breaking down a bunch. We’ve seen this scenario play out several times in the last few years. Roy’s right (as much as it feels weird to say such a thing…Roy making salient points that don’t involve homemade recipes for napalm…) in that the championship would be more interesting if we got some more non-standard teams and drivers in contention, but at least we don’t have to rely on any goofy points resetting or reseeding to ensure that a couple of drivers are close to one another at the end of the year.

  8. I would like it IF it was truely going to give the smaller teams a chance at the title.

    My favorite driver (Helio) may be a Penske driver, but I”m getting a little bored with Ganassi or Penske in victory lane. Andretti’s fine, but every weekend I’m crossing my fingers for a KV, de Ferran Dragon, Panther, or any other team to win.

    • Brian McKay Says:

      I haven’t been a fan of dandy Dan Wheldon since he defected from Andretti Green Racing. But now that he’s an underdog, I wouldn’t mind seeing him take a win each season. Would like to see Wilson, Hunter-Reay, Kanaan, Andretti and Rahal win again to prove that they can and that Penske & Ganassi teams aren’t invincible.

  9. Not to mention the green-white-checker finishes. The races are not long enough as it is.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: